Effects of Tongue-Holding Maneuver Compared with Mendelsohn Maneuver on Swallowing Function in Stroke Patients

Article information

Korean J Health Promot. 2015;15(2):83-90
Publication date (electronic) : 2015 December 19
doi : https://doi.org/10.15384/kjhp.2015.15.2.83
1Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Health Science, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea
2Department of rehabilitation, Chosun University Honam Regional Rehabilitation Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
3Department of Preventive Medicine, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
Corresponding author:Mi Ah Han, MD, PhD Department of Preventive Medicine, Chosun University College of Medicine, 309 Pilmun-daero, Dong-gu, Gwangju 501-759, Korea Tel: +82-62-230-6481, Fax: +82-62-225-8293 Email: mahan@chosun.ac.kr

This article is a condensed form of the first author's master's thesis from Chosun University.

Received 2015 March 05; Accepted 2015 April 23.

Abstract

Background

Dysphagia is a common complication in stroke patients. This study aimed to investigate the effects of the tongue-holding maneuver over an 8-week period on the swallowing function in stroke patients.

Methods

Twenty-eight stroke patients with dysphagia diagnosed within 1 year were randomly allocated to the experimental or control groups. The experimental (n=15) and control groups (n=13) performed the tongue-holding and Mendelsohn maneuver, respectively. And both groups additionally participated in traditional dysphagia therapy. The maneuvers were conducted for thirty minutes a day, five days a week, for six weeks, totaling forty sessions. Swallowing function with the functional dysphagia scale and swallowing pain with the visual analogue scale between the 2 groups were tested by chi-square tests, Mann-whitney testes, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

Results

The general characteristics, including age, sex, and disease history, between the two groups did not differ. After 8 weeks of intervention, swallowing function at the oral phase and the pharyngeal phase and the total score was significantly improved in both experimental and control groups. Also, swallowing pain decreased significantly in both groups. However, the change to swallowing function and pain between the groups were not different.

Conclusions

The tongue-holding maneuver practiced over an eight-week period improved the swallowing function in stroke patients.

Figure 1.

Tongue-holding maneuver.

Figure 2.

Mendelsohn maneuver.

Basic characteristics of subjects

Comparison of changes on the functional dysphagia scale before and after intervention

Comparison of pain changes on the visual analogue scale before and after intervention

References

1. Statistics Korea. Cause of death statistics Daejeon: Statistics Korea; 2013.
2. Kang BM, Kwon HC, Kim H, Cho YN. Effect of orofacial exercise on the swallowing function of stroke patients. J Korean Soc Occup Ther 2013;21(1):57–69.
3. Paciaroni M, Mazzotta G, Corea F, et al. Dysphagia following stroke. Eur Neurol 2004;51(3):162–67.
4. Song YG, Lee HS, Jung WM. Swallowing disorder Seoul: Gyechukmunhwasa; 2007.
5. Chon JS, Chun SI, Kim DA, Bae HS. Clinical evaluation of dysphagia in stroke patients (1). Ann Rehabil Med 1996;20(2):305–11.
6. Hah JH, Chang H. Interventional management of post-stroke dysphagia. JKDS 2014;4(1):11–7.
7. Silva AC, Fabio SR, Dantas RO. A scintigraphic study of oral, phatyngeal, and esophageal transit in patients with stroke. Dysphagia 2008;23(2):165–71.
8. Logemann JA. Swallowing disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2007;21(4):563–73.
9. Logemann JA. Evaluation and Treatment of Swallowing Disdorders-2e Seoul: Hakjisa; 2007.
10. Huckabee ML, Cannito MP. Outcomes of swallowing rehabilitation in chronic brainstem dysphagia: A retrospective evaluation. Dysphagia 1999;14(2):93–109.
11. Yoon IJ. Rehabilitation techniques for dysphagia. JKDS 2012;2(1):8–13.
12. Bodén K, Hallgren A, Witt Hedström H. Effects of three different swallow maneuvers analyzed by videomanometry. Acta Radiol 2006;47(7):628–33.
13. Lee SJ, Kim SY. Comparison of menselshon maneuver and electrical stimulation on swallowing ability of the stroke patients with dysphagia. KADR 2010;2(1):47–56.
14. Woo JH, Jeong WM, Kim YK, Koo JW. The relevant factors and effect of swallowing function on oropharyngeal stimulation program in stroke patients with swallowing disorder. J Korean Soc Occupational Therapy 2009;17(4):1–12.
15. Fujiu M, Logemann JA. Effect of a tongue-holding maneuver on posterior pharyngeal wall movement during deglutition. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1996;5(1):23–30.
16. Doeltgen SH, Witte U, Gumbley F, Huckabee ML. Evaluation of manometric measures during tongue-hold swallows. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2009;18(2):65–73.
17. OH JC, PARK JW, CHA TH, WOO HS, KIM DK. Exercise using tongue-holding swallow does not improve swallowing function in normal subjects. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39(5):364–9.
18. Woo HS, Chang KY, Oh JC. The effects of eight-week tongue-holding maneuver program on activation of swallowing-related muscles. J Korean Soc Occupational Therapy 2014;22(1):53–63.
19. Kisner C, Colby LA. Therapeutic exercise: Foundations and techniques Philadelpia, PA: F.A. Davis Company; 2007.
20. Kim YH, Han TR, Jung HY, et al. Clinical practice guideline for stroke rehabilitation in Korea. Brain Nuerorehabil 2009;2(1):1–38.
21. Radomski MV, Latham CAT. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction 6th ed.th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
22. Park YG, Cha TH, Jung MY. Rehabilitation dysphagia therapy for individuals with dysphagia. J Korean Dysphagia Soc 2011;1(1):31–8.
23. Park JS, Jeong CH, Oh DH. Effect of tongue pressure resistance training on tongue strength, swallowing function and dietary stage of chronic stroke patients with dysphagia. J Korean Soc Occupational Therapy 2014;22(3):11–24.
24. Lee YS, Byun YS, Choi JH, Ahn HJ. Evaluation of masticatory efficiency and oral health related quality of life in temporomandibular disorder patients. J Oral Med Pain 2010;35(2):135–47.
25. Lee EH, Choi JY. Development and utilization of assessment and intervention checklist for post-stroke dysphagia. Korean J Adult Nurs 2013;25(2):113–24.
26. Logemann JA. Treatment of oral and pharyngeal dysphagia. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2008;19(4):803–16.
27. Fujiu M, Logemann JA. Effect of a tongue-holding maneuver on posterior pharyngeal wall movement during deglutition. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1996;5:23–30.

Article information Continued

Figure 1.

Tongue-holding maneuver.

Figure 2.

Mendelsohn maneuver.

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of subjects

Experimental group (n=15) Control group (n=13) P
Sex
Male 8 (53.3) 6 (46.2) 0.705
Female 7 (46.7) 7 (53.8)
Age, y
<65 10 (66.7) 6 (46.2) 0.274
≥65 5 (33.3) 7 (53.8)
Diagnosis
Infarction 8 (53.3) 9 (69.2) 0.390
Hemorrhage 7 (46.7) 4 (30.8)
Duration
<6 7 (46.7) 8 (61.5) 0.431
≥6 8 (53.3) 5 (38.5)
Lifetime smoking experience
Yes 4 (26.7) 4 (30.8) 0.811
No 11 (73.3) 9 (69.2)
Lifetime drinking experience
Yes 10 (66.7) 7 (53.8) 0.488
No 5 (33.3) 6 (46.2)
Operation history
Yes 3 (20.0) 6 (46.2) 0.139
No 12 (80.0) 7 (53.8)
Disease history
Yes 11 (73.3) 8 (61.5) 0.505
No 4 (26.7) 5 (38.5)
Therapist
A 11 (73.3) 9 (69.2) 0.811
B 4 (26.7) 4 (30.8)

Values are presented as n (%).

Table 2.

Comparison of changes on the functional dysphagia scale before and after intervention

Experimental group Control group P
Oral phase
Pre 4.6±3.0 5.5±3.2 0.433
Post 3.0±3.4 4.4±2.8 0.113
Difference (pre-post) 1.6±1.5 1.2±1.5 0.331
P 0.006 0.020
Pharyngeal phase
Pre 29.2±12.5 32.6±14.3 0.711
Post 20.4±10.9 24.8±13.3 0.546
Difference (pre-post) 8.8±5.5 7.9±5.7 0.469
P 0.001 0.001
Total
Pre 33.8±13.1 38.2±15.7 0.419
Post 23.4±11.8 29.2±14.7 0.278
Difference (pre-post) 10.4±5.0 9.0±5.9 0.276
P 0.001 0.001

Values are presented as mean±SD.

Table 3.

Comparison of pain changes on the visual analogue scale before and after intervention

Experimental group Control group P
Pre 7.3±1.1 6.6±1.1 0.164
Post 4.9±0.8 4.7±0.9 0.675
Difference (pre-post) 2.4±0.9 1.9±0.8 0.199
P 0.001 0.001

Values are presented as mean±SD.