Mediating Effects of Perceived Barriers on the Relationship between Depression and Diabetes Management Self-efficacy in Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Heakung Hur; Jihea Choi; Eunhee Choi; Jinhwa Koh; Hakhee Moon

doi:10.15384/kjhp.2015.15.4.235

Korean J Health Promot > Volume 15(4); 2015 > Article

Hur, Choi, Choi, Koh, and Moon: Mediating Effects of Perceived Barriers on the Relationship between Depression and Diabetes Management Self-efficacy in Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Original Article

Korean Journal of Health Promotion 2015;15(4):235-243.

Published online: December 19, 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15384/kjhp.2015.15.4.235

Mediating Effects of Perceived Barriers on the Relationship between Depression and Diabetes Management Self-efficacy in Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Heakung Hur¹, Jihea Choi¹, Eunhee Choi², Jinhwa Koh¹, Hakhee Moon³

¹Department of Nursing, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea

²Institute of Lifestyle Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea

³Department of Nursing, Yeoju Institute of Technology, Yeoju, Korea

￭ Corresponding author：Jihea Choi, PhD Department of Nursing, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju 06273, Korea
Tel: +82-33-741-0379, Fax: +82-33-743-9490 E-mail: jiheachoi@yonsei.ac.kr

Received July 09, 2015 Accepted October 12, 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ABSTRACT

Background

Diabetes mellitus is a life threatening disease that one out of ten Korean adults aged over 30 has it. Depression of diabetes patients affects the perception on their health negatively and self-management inefficiently, and then leads to a failure in blood sugar control. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the relationships among depression, perceived barriers and self-efficacy on diabetes management in depth.

Methods

This descriptive study was undertaken to identify the mediating effects of perceived barriers on the relationship between depression and self-efficacy on diabetes management among type 2 diabetes patients. 173 patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited from an out-patient clinic of Y university hospital. Data were collected from June 26 to July 18, 2014 using a structured self-report questionnaire, and analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficients, multiple regressions, and Sobel test.

Results

Among173 participants, 12.1% were classified as depressed group. Self-efficacy on diabetes management was found to be significantly associated with education level and the presence of complications. Depression and perceived barriers were positively related to each other, but both were negatively related to self-efficacy on diabetes management. In addition, perceived barriers were found to mediate the relationship between depression and diabetes management self-efficacy.

Conclusions

Strategic nursing interventions based on considerations of the relationship between perceived barriers and self-efficacy on diabetes management need to be provided for type 2 diabetes patients with depression.

Keywords: Type 2 Diabetes, Depression, Perceived barriers, Self-efficacy

Figure 1.

Mediation model

Table 1.

Depression, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy on diabetes management (N＝173)

Variables	Total number of items	Scale	Possible range	Actual range	Mean±SD^a
Depression	9	0-3	0-27	0-21	0.48±0.47
Perceived barriers	8	1-5	8-40	8-27	1.79±0.59
Diabetes management self-	efficacy 20	1-5	20-100	30-99	3.18±0.53

^aMean and SD were divided by total number of items to compare variables.

Table 2.

Depression, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy on diabetes management according to general characteristics (N＝ 173)

Characteristics		N (%) Mean±SD (range)	Depression		Perceived barriers		self-efficacy on diabetes management
Characteristics		N (%) Mean±SD (range)	Mean±SD (range)	t/F/r (P)	Mean±SD (range)	t/F/r (P)	Mean±SD (range)	t/F/r (P)
Age, y		59.42±10.1	-	-0.01	-	0.07	-	0.07
Age, y		(31-75)		(0.087)		(0.362)		(0.369)
Sex	Female	79(45.7)	0.47±0.51	-0.46	1.77±0.60	-0.68	3.18±0.56	0.07
Sex	Male	94(54.3)	0.57±0.44	(0.646)	1.82±0.57	(0.499)	3.17±0.49	(0.946)
Education	Not educated (A)	12(6.9)	0.82±0.31	2.26	2.02±0.55	1.28	2.78±0.73	4.65
	Elementary school (B)	21(12.1)	0.60±0.63	(0.066)	1.77±0.65	(0.280)	3.10±0.55	(0.001)
	Junior school (C)	45(26.0)	0.46±0.39		1.87±0.57		3.20±0.47	(A＜E)^a
	High school (D)	71(41.0)	0.42±0.49		1.77±0.57		3.14±0.47
	College or over (E)	24(13.9)	0.42±0.46		1.61±0.63		3.51±0.49
Income	Very low (A)	13(7.5)	0.74±0.47	3.60	1.84±0.61	0.29	3.02±0.85	1.29
	Low (B)	54(31.2)	0.52±0.45	(0.015)	1.83±0.54	(0.831)	3.10±0.48	(0.280)
	Moderate (C)	88(50.9)	0.47±0.51	(A＞D)^a	1.75±0.61		3.21±0.48
	High (D)	18(10.4)	0.20±0.23		1.86±0.65		3.31±0.60
BMI, kg/m²		24.53±3.40	-	0.06		0.06	-	0.01
BMI, kg/m²		(17.31-39.06)		(0.422)		(0.416)		(0.894)
Type of treatment	Diabetes pills (A)	113(65.3)	0.38±0.43	8.71	1.82±0.60	0.41	3.20±0.50	0.45
	Insulin (B)	29(16.8)	0.66±0.48	(＜0.001)	1.77±0.58	(0.667)	3.16±0.55	(0.638)
	Diabetes pills & Insulin (C)	31(17.9)	0.70±0.52	(A＜B, C)^a	1.72±0.58		3.10±0.61
Duration of diabetes, mo		138.7±108.47	-	0.08	-	-0.14	-	-0.08
Duration of diabetes, mo		(2-480)		(0.299)		(0.061)		(0.317)
Complications	Yes	52(30.1)	0.66±0.50	3.41	1.74±0.53	-0.77	3.04±0.59	-2.25
Complications	No	121(69.9)	0.40±0.45	(0.001)	1.82±0.61	(0.438)	3.23±0.49	(0.026)

Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.

^aPost-hoc: Scheffe test.

Table 3.

Relationship among depression, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy on diabetes management (N＝173)

Variables	Perceived barriers	self-efficacy on diabetes management
Variables	r (P)	r (P)
Depression	0.16 (0.035)	-0.20 (0.010)
Perceived barriers		-0.31 (＜0.001)

Table 4.

Influencing of covariate variables and depression to perceived barriers (path a) (N＝ 173)

Variables		path a
Variables		β (P)
Education status	High school or over	1.00
	Junior school or below	-.10 (0.189)
Complications	Yes	1.00
	No	-.11 (0.184)
Depression		.17 (0.028)

Table 5.

Influence of covariate variables and perceived barriers on self-efficacy on diabetes management (path b) (N＝173)

Variables		path b
Variables		β (P)
Education status	High school or over	1.00
	Junior school or below	0.05 (0.469)
Complications	Yes	1.00
	No	-0.17 (0.018)
Perceived barriers		-0.31 (＜0.001)

Table 6.

Influence of covariate variables, depression, and perceived barriers on self-efficacy on diabetes management (path c, path c´) (N＝ 173)

Variables		path c	path c´
Variables		β (P)	β (P)
Education status	High school or over	1.00	1.00
	Junior school or below	0.08 (0.325)	0.05 (0.537)
Complications	Yes	1.00	1.00
	No	-0.12 (0.132)	-0.15 (0.049)
Depression		-0.16 (0.047)	-0.10 (0.168)
Perceived barriers			-0.30 (＜0.001)

Sobel test Z＝-1.98, P＝0.047

REFERENCES

1.. National Health Insurance Service, Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. 2012 National Health Insurance Statistacl Yearbook. Seoul: National Health Insurance Service, Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service; 2013.

2.. Jang YS, Ham SY. Comparison of cause-specific death rate among the OECD countries. Issue & Focus 2014;257:1-8.

3.. Park IB, Baik SH. Epidemiologic characteristics of diabetes mellitus in Korea: current status of diabetic patients using Korean health insurance database. Korean Diabetes J 2009;33(5):357-62.

4.. Köster I, von Ferber L, Ihle P, Schubert I, Hauner H. The cost burden of diabetes mellitus: the evidence from Germany--the CoDiM study. Diabetologia 2006;49(7):1498-504.

5.. Wu SF, Huang YC, Lee MC, Wang TJ, Tung HH, Wu MP. Self-efficacy, self-care behavior, anxiety, and depression in Taiwanese with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey. Nurs Health Sci 2013;15(2):213-9.

6.. Löfman S, Hakko H, Mainio A, Timonen M, Räsänen P. Characteristics of suicide among diabetes patients: a population based study of suicide victims in Northern Finland. J Psycho-som Res 2012;73(4):268-71.

7.. Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ. The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2001;24(6):1069-78.

8.. Egede LE, Ellis C. The effects of depression on diabetes knowledge, diabetes self-management, and perceived control in indigent patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008;10(3):213-9.

9.. Tovar E, Rayens MK, Gokun Y, Clark M. Mediators of adherence among adults with comorbid diabetes and depression: the role of self-efficacy and social support. J Health Psychol 2015;20(11):1405-15.

10.. Siebolds M, Gaedeke O, Schwedes U. SMBG Study Group. Self-monitoring of blood glucose--psychological aspects relevant to changes in HbA1c in type 2 diabetic patients treated with diet or diet plus oral antidiabetic medication. Patient Educ Couns 2006;62(1):104-10.

11.. Aljasem LI, Peyrot M, Wissow L, Rubin RR. The impact of barriers and self-efficacy on self-care behaviors in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2001;27(3):393-404.

12.. Park JY, Ko IS. Development of a comprehensive self-management program promoting self efficacy for type 2 diabetic patients. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs 2012;19(1):74-86.

13.. Chao J, Nau DP, Aikens JE, Taylor SD. The mediating role of health beliefs in the relationship between depressive symptoms and medication adherence in persons with diabetes. Res Social Adm Pharm 2005;1(4):508-25.

14.. Cherrington A, Wallston KA, Rothman RL. Exploring the relationship between diabetes self-efficacy, depressive symptoms, and glycemic control among men and women with type 2 diabetes. J Behav Med 2010;33(1):81-9.

15.. Nam SI, Choi KH, Yi HJ. Self-perceived health status, depression, and suicidal behavior among people with diabetes. Korean J Social Welfare Studies 2014;45(1):231-54.

16.. Jeong Y, Kim M. Comparative study on HbA1C, self-care behavior, and quality of life by depression status in type II diabetic patients. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs 2012;19(3):353-62.

17.. DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Depression is a risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment: meta-analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence. Arch Intern Med 2000;160(14):2101-7.

18.. Robertson SM, Amspoker AB, Cully JA, Ross EL, Naik AD. Affective symptoms and change in diabetes self–efficacy and gly-caemic control. Diabet Med 2013;30(5):e189-96.

19.. An JY, Seo ER, Lim KH, Shin JH, Kim JB. Standardization of the Korean version of screening tool for depression(Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9). J Korean Soc Biol Ther Psychiatry 2013;19(1):47-56.

20.. Tan MY. The relationship of health beliefs and complication prevention behaviors of Chinese individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2004;66(1):71-7.

21.. Kartal A, Ozsoy SA. Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of health belief model scale in diabetic patients. Int J Nurs Stud 2007;44(8):1447-58.

22.. Bijl JV, Poelgeest-Eeltink AV, Shortridge-Baggett L. The psychometric properties of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Adv Nurs 1999;30(2):352-9.

23.. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;51(6):1173-82.

24.. Cho YG. The interrelationship between diabetes and depression. Korean J Fam Med 2014;35(3):109-10.

25.. Nicolau J, Masmiquel L. Diabetes mellitus and depressive disorder, an undesirable association. Endocrinol Nutr 2013;60(10):583-9.

26.. Lee CW. Health status and self-management barriers in people with diabetes -a comparison by medicaid beneficiary status. Korean J Social Welfare Studies 2008;60(4):231-51.

27.. Hur HK, Park SM. Difference of decisional balance and confidence in the stage of adoption for breast self exam in married women. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs 2004;16(3):493-501.